wind energy

Onshore vs Offshore Wind Energy – What You Need to Know in 2025

by

📑 Table of Contents

📘 Introduction

Wind energy is surging worldwide. Nearly 117 GW of new wind capacity were installed in 2024. This boosted global capacity to around 1,136 GW. Onshore projects dominated with 109 GW, while offshore added 8 GW, bringing cumulative offshore capacity to 83 GW (about 7.3 % of the total).

From rural hilltops to deep‑sea platforms, turbines are transforming landscapes and seascapes into clean power hubs. This article examines the technological, economic, and environmental differences between onshore and offshore wind developments. It explores what lies ahead as both evolve to shape the global energy transition.

🌍 Wind Energy at a Glance

Modern wind power has transformed from small-scale mechanical mills into one of the fastest-growing sources of electricity. According to GWEC, total wind installations reached 1,136 GW in 2024. Offshore wind, though smaller in share, is poised for rapid growth. Advances in floating turbine technology and global net-zero commitments drive this growth.

Wind energy

🌾 Onshore Wind Energy

Definition

Onshore wind farms are built on land, typically in open plains, hills, or mountain passes where wind speeds are consistent. Turbines range in capacity from 2 MW to over 6 MW. The latest models have rotor diameters exceeding 160 meters.

Advantages

Lower capital and O&M costs compared to offshore projects

Onshore wind projects typically involve capital costs ranging from $1,000–1,700 per kW. In contrast, offshore installations can exceed $3,000‑5,000/kW. This makes onshore projects substantially cheaper to build. Operational expenditures are lower for onshore turbines. They operate in more accessible terrain. These turbines avoid marine logistics. This helps keep lifetime O&M costs significantly below those offshore.

Faster deployment timelines due to simpler logistics

Streamlined permitting and logistics enable typical onshore wind projects to move from planning to operation in approximately 4.5 years, compared to 5.5 to 12 years offshore, offering much quicker deployment timelines. The simpler onshore terrain simplifies construction. Additionally, there are fewer regulatory hurdles. The absence of subsea grid arrangements also speeds up interconnection processes, making onshore wind faster to roll out.

Established supply chains and widespread technical expertise

Onshore wind benefits from mature supply chains—e.g. the U.S. currently hosts over 500 manufacturing facilities producing blades, nacelles, towers and turbines for land-based projects. With decades of deployment, engineering knowledge is widely available. Skilled local workforce across dozens of countries enhances installation capacity. This speeds up project execution and provides resilience to commodity shock.

Challenges

Land‑use conflicts and visual impact

Onshore wind farms require significant land footprints. They often span hundreds of square kilometers. This raise concerns over habitat loss, agricultural displacement, and the industrialization of rural landscapes. These issues are especially pressing in scenic or culturally significant areas. Such developments frequently trigger local opposition. They disrupt heritage sites or obstruct rural vistas. This leads to stricter siting restrictions in countries like Ireland, Spain, and the UK.

Community opposition and regulatory delays

Public resistance to onshore projects is growing. This is especially true where turbines exceed 200 m or are sited near residential zones, tourism sites, or indigenous lands. Recent campaigns in New South Wales and Wales have shown this trend. These campaigns delayed or halted plans. These disputes often escalate into prolonged permitting processes. They involve legal challenges or revocation of project approvals. This undermines investor certainty and slows the rollout.

Wind resource variability in complex terrain

Performance in complex terrains, such as hills or ridges, can be unpredictable. Traditional wind speed modeling at daily resolution underestimates available wind power density. It does so by nearly 36 %. This underestimation leads to less accurate site assessments and reduced energy yield. This variability often requires expensive micro-sitting studies. Alternatively, more advanced digital-twin simulation tools can be used. These methods optimize turbine placement and maximize capacity output.

🧪 Case Study: Castilla-La Mancha Onshore Wind – Spain

Castilla-La Mancha, located in central Spain, is a leading region for onshore wind development in Europe. It has over 3 GW of installed capacity. The region’s expansive plains and favorable wind conditions host hundreds of turbines, supplying clean electricity to millions of Spanish households. This capacity is integral to Spain’s national renewable energy strategy. It helps reduce dependence on fossil fuels and cuts greenhouse gas emissions. Supported by robust grid infrastructure and local manufacturing, Castilla-La Mancha wind sector has driven rural economic growth. It has created jobs in construction, maintenance, and operations. This development reinforces Spain’s leadership in the EU green energy transition.

🌊 Offshore Wind Energy

Definition

Offshore wind farms are located in seas and oceans. Turbines are installed on fixed-bottom foundations in shallow waters. They are also placed on floating platforms in deeper areas. Offshore turbines can exceed 15 MW each, maximizing output.

Advantages

Higher and more consistent wind speeds → capacity factors of 40–60%

Offshore wind farms benefit from unobstructed ocean breezes and lower surface roughness. They deliver average capacity factors for around 58%. This is compared to less than 30% for onshore installations in many regions. In premium offshore locations like Class 7 sites, capacity factors are projected to reach 50–58%. These sites offer significantly higher generation reliability. They also provide greater system value.

Vast expansion potential without competing for land

The global technical potential for offshore wind exceeds 17 TW. It far outstrips onshore limits. Turbines can be deployed in deep waters using floating platforms that reach up to 1 km depth. The EU has ambitious targets. They aim to grow from 15 GW in 2024 to around 300 GW by 2050. Offshore wind offers immense room for scale. It does not encroach on scarce land resources.

Reduced community impact from noise or visuals

Offshore turbines are located well offshore. They are often tens of kilometers from the coast. This positioning minimizes any audible or visual intrusion for land-based communities. It dramatically reduces local opposition compared with onshore projects. As a result, offshore developments tend to navigate permitting and intergovernmental coordination more smoothly, especially in densely populated coastal regions.

Challenges

Higher installation and maintenance costs due to marine conditions

Offshore wind projects face significantly higher capital and operational expenditures. Typical CapEx per kW for fixed‑bottom offshore installations is over $5,400/kW. In contrast, it is under $2,000/kW for onshore. This difference is driven by specialized foundations, vessels, and subsea infrastructure. Maintenance costs are also elevated. They account for up to 25–30% of total lifecycle costs. This is due to harsher saltwater corrosion, difficult marine access, and vessel-based labor complexities.

Complex grid connection requiring subsea cables

Connecting offshore sites to the onshore grid requires long-distance HVAC or HVDC subsea cables. These cables are expensive and time-consuming to manufacture and install. Offshore export cables alone can cost over $193,000 per project unit and often face supply constraints. Routing cables through marine-protected zones adds regulatory delays. Avoiding seabed hazards and securing interconnection permissions also increase complexity. These issues lead to heightened project risk exposure.

Specialized vessels and weather windows for construction

Construction of offshore wind depends on a shrinking global fleet of expensive jack‑up installation vessels (WTIVs). Each vessel can cost up to $335 million or over $220,000/day. Shortages of these ships can significantly delay projects. Offshore construction must also contend with narrow weather and sea-state windows. Poor conditions can disrupt installation schedules. They can also extend downtime and elevate costs for chartered vessels and crews.

🧪 Case Study: Hornsea 2 Offshore Wind Farm – United Kingdom

Hornsea 2 is located in the North Sea off the Yorkshire coast. It is the world’s largest operational offshore wind farm. It boasts a capacity of 1.3 GW. Operated by Ørsted, its 165 Siemens Gamesa 8 MW turbines generate enough electricity to power over 1.4 million UK homes annually.

The project spans 462 km², larger than the city of Andorra, and is connected to shore via high‑voltage subsea cables. Completed in 2022, Hornsea 2 showcases the scalability of offshore wind. It drives significant carbon emissions reductions and supports the UK’s target of 50 GW offshore capacity by 2030. Also, it supports the UK’s target of 50 GW offshore capacity by 2030. It also created thousands of jobs during construction and ongoing operations.

⚖️ Onshore vs. Offshore: A Comparative Analysis

FactorOnshore WindOffshore Wind
Capacity Factor25–45%40–60%
Cost per MW Installed$1.3–1.8 M$3–4.5 M
Grid ConnectionEasier & cheaperComplex & costly
Lifespan20–25 years20–25 years
Environmental ImpactLand ecosystemsMarine ecosystems

🌱 Economic, Social & Environmental Considerations

Economic Considerations

Wind farms boost local economies. Construction and operations generate jobs. Rural communities benefit from recurring land lease payments. They also enjoy enhanced tax revenue, as seen in U.S. projects reporting ~4% income gains per worker and over $1 billion in local tax contributions in 2022. Offshore wind drives additional port, manufacturing, and logistics growth; for example, the U.S. offshore wind industry is projected to support 56,000 jobs by 2030, enhancing regional economies and diversifying coastal sectors.

Social Considerations

Wind energy can increase community acceptance. This is more likely when residents are included as stakeholders or investors. Such inclusion leads to greater support and a social license to operate in regions, such as the U.S. Great Plains. However, developments may also trigger opposition from local or indigenous communities if consultation is insufficient. In Colombia, for example, wind projects have stalled due to unresolved social tensions in La Guajira.

Environmental Considerations

Wind power has among the lowest lifecycle greenhouse‑gas emissions of any energy source. It has no fuel consumption, reducing air pollution and helping mitigate climate change. It does this with minimal land disruption (< 1% permanent impact). Nonetheless, offshore wind poses ecological risks. These include marine mammal disturbance, seabird collision threats, and habitat shifts. Comprehensive environmental assessments and mitigation planning are required.

Wind energy 2025

🧠 Technological Innovations Driving Growth

Taller turbines & longer blades → Increased swept area and energy yield

Modern utility-scale turbines now boast rotor diameters of up to 220 m. This delivers a swept area increase of over 40% compared to older models. This increase translates directly into higher energy capture. This is thanks to the physics defined by Betz Law. This scaling boosts annual yield and capacity factors. It enables some new turbines to achieve industry-leading performance levels. It also reduces the levelized cost of energy per megawatt-hour.

Floating offshore wind platforms → Unlocking deepwater potential

Floating offshore wind platforms unlock access to deepwater sites beyond 60 m depths—where up to two-thirds of U.S. offshore wind potential resides—thus enabling deployment in high‑wind areas previously unreachable by fixed‑bottom turbines. IRENA and industry reports expect these floating systems to push costs down from approximately $150/MWh in 2020. They predict costs to fall to about ~$60/MWh by 2030. This would make deepwater wind increasingly viable and scalable.

Hybrid renewable systems → Co-location with solar and storage

Co‑locating wind with solar PV and battery storage allows for shared infrastructure. This configuration enables grid connection. NREL studies demonstrate up to 12% reductions in balance‑of‑system (BOS) costs compared to dispersed systems. This reduction improves project economics. As of end‑2023, the U.S. hosted nearly 49 GW of hybrid renewable plants (>1 MW), with wind-plus-storage configurations increasingly common and enhancing grid resilience.

Digital twins & AI monitoring → Predictive maintenance and optimized operations

Digital twin platforms paired with AI enable real-time simulation and analysis of turbine health. These technologies allow operators to predict maintenance needs and minimize downtime. They help extend asset life while optimizing energy output. Industry deployments show that AI-driven monitoring can reduce unscheduled maintenance by up to 30–40%. This significantly lowers lifecycle O&M costs. It also improves overall efficiency.

📈 Policy & Market Trends

Government auctions and feed‑in tariffs are accelerating investment

Competitive auctions have significantly impacted renewable energy capacity in regions like Latin America. Evolving feed‑in tariff regimes have also played a major role. Together, they have driven up to 80% of renewable energy capacity in these areas. These systems use transparent, price-discovery procurement methods. They significantly reduce LCOE compared to earlier subsidized models. In Europe and Asia, auction-based systems are replacing fixed-feed tariffs. This change helps countries achieve more cost-competitive contracts and speeds up wind project rollout.

Corporate PPAs drive demand from tech, retail, and manufacturing giants

In 2024, corporations contracted a record 68 GW of clean energy PPAs. Data centers and tech firms led this growth. They accounted for nearly 17 GW in the U.S. alone. This spurred growth across wind and solar markets. These long-term agreements offer financial stability and sustainability credentials to buyers, helping developers secure financing and drive large-scale renewable investments.

Offshore leasing reforms in Europe, the US, and Asia are expanding project pipelines

Recent reforms, such as centralizing site selection and tender design in Germany’s updated EEG and streamlining leasing in the U.S. and Asia, are opening new large-scale offshore opportunities and reducing permit complexity. These policies are critical in scaling offshore capacity, with Europe expecting 78 GW by 2030 and U.S. reforms accelerating beyond currently stalled pipelines.

Emerging markets (Vietnam, Colombia, and South Africa) are poised for large-scale adoption

Latin America—including Colombia—has seen over 80% of renewable capacity installed through public tenders and PPAs. This positions the region for rapid wind sector growth. In South Africa, the REIPPPP has already awarded over 6.2 GW across wind and solar projects, making the country a key emerging market in Africa’s clean energy expansion.

🔮 The Future of Wind Energy

Between 2025 and 2035, offshore wind is projected to expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of approximately 14.6%, increasing market value from around USD 64 billion in 2025. It is expected to rise to over USD 250 billion by 2035. This increase is roughly three times faster than onshore development. At the same time, global wind energy will become a backbone of green hydrogen production. It is expected to contribute 4–7% of global final energy consumption by 2050. This increase is fueled by rising electrolysis from wind-powered plants in Europe and beyond.

Growing investment in grid and cross-border transmission infrastructure is crucial. Meshed offshore grids in the North Sea will help integrate onshore and offshore wind. This integration will be more seamless into a robust, decarbonized global energy system.

“The next decade will see offshore wind shift from niche to mainstream.” It will become a major energy source, says a senior analyst at the Global Wind Energy Council.

📌 Key Takeaways

  1. Global wind capacity reached 1,136 GW in 2024, with offshore wind making up 83 GW (~7.3%).
  2. Onshore wind is cost-effective, with lower CapEx ($1,000–1,700/kW), faster deployment (~4.5 years), and mature supply chains, but faces land-use conflicts and visual impact challenges.
  4. Offshore wind delivers higher capacity factors (40–60%). It has vast untapped potential (>17 TW) and minimal community disruption. However, it involves higher installation costs, complex subsea grid connections, and vessel constraints.
  5. Technological advances, like taller turbines, floating platforms, hybrid systems, and AI monitoring, are boosting efficiency and unlocking new markets.
  6. Policy drivers include government auctions, corporate PPAs, and offshore leasing reforms in key markets.
  7. Emerging markets like Vietnam, Colombia, and South Africa are set for large-scale wind expansion.
  9. Between 2025–2035, offshore wind is projected to grow three times faster than onshore. It will play a pivotal role in green hydrogen production and in integrated global grids.

📣Call to Action

Wind energy is at the heart of our global transition to a cleaner, more resilient energy system. Whether harnessed on land or at sea, the potential is immense. Stay ahead with insights into the latest technologies, market trends, and policy shifts driving this transformation. Join the conversation, explore our in-depth analysis, and help shape a sustainable future. Read more on EcoPowerHub and be part of the energy revolution.

🔗 Internal Links

  1. How to Build Resilient Renewable Energy in the Caribbean?
  2. Renewable Energy Innovations: The Way for a Greener Future

📚 Key Online Resources

Discover more from EcoPowerHub

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Discover more from EcoPowerHub

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading